Tuesday, July 23, 2013

FI: Orlando

Orlando
UK, 1992
Written and Directed by Sally Potter

Though today Tilda Swinton is something of a cultural institution, an Oscar winner and franchise cornerstone whose enigmatic persona is well-known enough to be fodder for a famous Twitter parody account, she did not have the same international profile when she took on the title role in Sally Potter's Orlando. After watching it, I'm amazed her star took as long to rise as it did. The film, an adaptation of Virginia Woolf's novel, is a story about the fluidity of gender and sexuality, and the ways the perceptions of each change a person's social status and potential roles. Orlando begins as an androgynous nobleman (as was the style at the time), a favorite of Queen Elizabeth I (Quentin Crisp) who somehow becomes immortal and unaging. Through the centuries he lives, loves, and indulges in art, literature, and travel. One day, Orlando awakes to find he has become a woman, and lives until the present day while exploring the options and expectations society offers to—or withholds from—her in her new gender.

Swinton's performance is the standout, here. She uses her lithe frame and malleable features to do the heavy lifting in conveying Orlando's fluid gender, not relying on some false deep voice or exaggerated feminine traits to beat the conceit into the ground. Potter leaves much unanswered, but the material's magical tone and the film's loose, dreamy style don't create a demand for answers. Orlando's unique nature is never questioned, played for laughs, or made into An Issue, even when her femininity causes her problems within England's patriarchal peerage system. Yes, Orlando would be a progressive film even today, to say nothing of the climate in which it premiered, but Potter lets her themes spring up organically and without force. We come away realizing that people can express a range of genders and sexual proclivities without it changing their essential humanity or worth. There is no need to spell it out in neon lights.

If I have a complaint, and it is a rare one for me to make, it's that the film could have been longer and still not overstayed its welcome. I wouldn't have minded delving deeper into Orlando's life at any point in her extended timeline, especially some of the eras that Potter's script necessarily elides to meet Orlando's brisk, ninety-minute running time. As it stands, story becomes a secondary concern, which would prove problematic were the lush visuals and thematic structure not as well handled as they are. Still, although Orlando may feel too slight and insubstantial for some audiences, its spell largely worked on me

5 comments:

  1. She would be great to play... well, Orlando, if a proper LoEG film were made. http://lxg.wikia.com/wiki/Orlando

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Jeez, I had no idea she was a part of LXG. Great character choice. And yeah, she makes for a hell of an acting part, however one chooses to use her!

      Delete
  2. I love Tilda Swinton. She was the only reason I did not totally hate The Curious Case of Benjamin Button.

    Orlando is on my Netflix list now but who knows when I will return the stuff I have and actually get it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's worth seeing for her performance alone, as long as you're aware of the sparseness of the story and all of that. But certainly, don't rush back something you've been meaning to watch just for this :)

      Delete
  3. I long ago gave up rushing any of my Netflix movies back.


    ReplyDelete